On 30 Aug 2008, at 21:57, Roger Pack wrote:
As a note--using the mongrel example from
http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/web/mongrel/files/README.html and Mongrel
1.1.5
It yielded (for me) ~800 req/s [running ab -n 1000 -c 1
http://localhost:3000/test]
and if I changed
out.write("hello!\n")
to
out.write("hello!\n"*10_000)
AFAIK that's not the fastest of operations.
it yielded ~300 req/s.
I was unable to get evented mongrel to run so wasn't able to compare
the
two.
Doing a little bit of investigating, kcachegrind+ruby-prof points the
latency to http_response.rb line 137
@socket.write(data)
Experimenting by changing this line haphazardly to
while data and data.length > 0
wrote = @socket.write_nonblock(data)
data = data[wrote..-1]
end
yielded ~938 req/s [AFAICT]
Thin and ebb both write more like this.
Thoughts?
-=R
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_______________________________________________
Mongrel-users mailing list
Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
_______________________________________________
Mongrel-users mailing list
Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
