Luis Lavena wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Anton Trapp <tmp...@allproducts.info>
> wrote:
>> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel.rb:285:in `run'
>> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel/command.rb:212:in
>> `run'
>> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/mongrel_rails:281
>> /usr/bin/mongrel_rails:19:in `load'
>> /usr/bin/mongrel_rails:19
>>
>> Any ideas? alternatives?
>>
>
> If you're mentioning hundred of megabytes it might be possible that
> the Ruby instance is not able to handle the file properly.
>
> Would be great if you can isolate this to a real minimum mongrel
> handler example instead of a Rails application.
>
> I had successfully uploaded big files with mongrel, but honestly never
> tried to upload 200mb or similar because will be suboptimal.
>
> --
> Luis Lavena
> AREA 17
> -
> Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
> but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
> Antoine de Saint-Exupé²¹
yaa luis
i am sending form with mutipart true option
like
<%= form_tag ({:action => 'uploadFile'},:multipart => true) %>
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_______________________________________________
Mongrel-users mailing list
Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
