I just browsed through the doc and saw these statements;
(1) if failed .. then alert (2) alert [EMAIL PROTECTED]It hit me that it would be more elegant to append the standalone alert statement in (2) directly to alert in (1). That is,
if failed .. then alert [EMAIL PROTECTED]In other words I suggest that we change the alert action statement to this,
ALERT [EMAIL PROTECTED] [,[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] What do you think? -- Jan-Henrik Haukeland Mobil +47 97141255
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ monit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev
