I compile it myself.
But I think it's a misunderstanding (sorry for my bad english level).
It's a change made previously, which remove /etc/monit/monitrc from default
location. So, it's not bug (but I can't find in the changelog when it was
made (somewhere between 4.8.2 and 4.10). When using debian etch package,
/etc/monit/monitrc was allowed, but when I compile it, it was not, and I
search for it.
Maybe Ivanka is in the same case.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Brian Candler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:33:21AM +0200, pierrick grasland wrote:
> > I encounter this problem to on debian, so I don't think it's from the
> > packaging.
>
> Did you use a debian package, or did you compile monit yourself from
> source?
>
> If the former, then it sounds very much like a packaging problem.
>
> Furthermore, what exact version of monit are you running?
>
> Looking at the source code of 4.10.1, I see that exactly the same logic is
> used for reading the config file with or without -t. The difference the -t
> flag makes is to *stop* monit from running after it has read the config
> file.
>
> ...
> if(! parse(Run.controlfile)) {
>
> exit(1);
>
> }
>
> /*
> * Stop and report success if we are just validating the Control
> * file syntax. The previous parse statement exits the program with
> * an error message if a syntax error is present in the control
> * file.
> */
> if(Run.testing) {
>
> LogInfo("Control file syntax OK\n");
> exit(0);
>
> }
> ...
>
> Regards,
>
> Brian.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> monit-dev mailing list
> monit-dev@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev
>
--
Pierrick Grasland
_______________________________________________
monit-dev mailing list
monit-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev
