Hi, Is there anything we could do to get it to the 5.3 version? If not, when is the version after it planned?
> Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 00:04:52 +0200 > From: Jan-Henrik Haukeland > To: The monit developer list <monit-dev@nongnu.org> > Subject: Re: [monit-dev] Settle feature > Message-ID: <96045e36-444f-4896-ab14-002a17c51...@tildeslash.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Thank you very much. This looks useful. We are about to release a new > version of Monit which changes every a bit, but it should not be too > problematic to include this patch. We'll see if we can include this in later > versions, not the upcoming 5.3 though. > > Jan-Henrik > > > > On Sep 1, 2011, at 6:54 PM, David Kohen wrote: > > > Hello, > > Although you recommended to ask before developing a feature, but we > really need it, so I developed it anyway. > > > > I call this feature settle, it's purpose is to allow a daemon to settle > before it is monitored, it is mutually exclusive with "every" (not by > definition, but in practice). > > It uses the same syntax as "every" and to make it work I changed the > behaviour of verify to check the monitor state and make it MONITOR_YES only > in the next cycle. > > > > We'd really love it if this feature will be integrated in your tree, as > we're going to use it quite often. > > > > BTW, the latest tree doesn't build due to a missing header, probably > residue from libmonit. > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > > > David Kohen > > Waze IFS team. > > > > -- David Kohen Waze IFS team.
_______________________________________________ monit-dev mailing list monit-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev
