sorry, it was just typo ... hanged -> changed
Martin
On Oct 7, 2007, at 12:27 AM, Moshe Cohen wrote:
Hi,
(off list)
Didn't quite understand what you mean by "hanged".
Is there a source change I can try.
TIA
Moshe
On 10/6/07, Martin Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK, i
hanged the code to continue the monitoring.
Thanks :)
Martin
Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
> On 5. okt. 2007, at 23.39, Martin Pala wrote:
>
>> Should we allow further monitoring? It can be probably better (more
>> flexible).
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> + 1 I think we should
>
>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> Martin Pala wrote:
>>> Yes, the idea behind it is that the zombie process is usually
>>> unmanageable.
>>> Monit thus sends alert and stops the zombie service monitoring.
>>> Martin
>>> MosheC wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I have the following line check process xxx with pidfile
>>>> /home/moshe/icpipe/run/xxx.pid
>>>> Process xxx occasionally becomes a zombie but a new one is
created
>>>> automatically.
>>>>
>>>> The problem is that monit automatically stops monitoring the
process
>>>> when it
>>>> zombies.
>>>>
>>>> I have also tried to trick Monit to think it can restart the
process
>>>> itself
>>>> with:
>>>> check process xxx with pidfile /home/moshe/icpipe/run/xxx.pid
>>>> start program = "/bin/true" ###
>>>> stop program = "/bin/true" ###
>>>> but that didn't help either.
>>>>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
--
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
--
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
