Hmm. Well, each is a separate config file (with the exception of the two
servercomm and two bucardo tests). They're not in any order.
root@xxx-yy-zzz-db1-primary: /etc/monit/conf.d # ls -1
bucardo
cron
dnsupdate
exim4
ntpd
peervpn
postgresql
salt-minion
servercomm
snmpd
sshd
syslogd
But - as before - it really doesn't matter. No sense expending cycles on
an answer to a curiosity.. Thanks for the reply.
On 12/9/14 6:37 AM, Martin Pala wrote:
Hi Paul,
the output of status/summary is not sorted by name - it dumps the services in
the same order which is used in the configuration file.
Regards,
Martin
On 06 Dec 2014, at 02:51, Paul Theodoropoulos <[email protected]> wrote:
I've noticed that both monit status and monit summary output their info in
reverse alpha order (with the exception of the 'system'), like so:
Process 'syslogd' Running
Process 'sshd' Running
Process 'snmpd' Running
Process 'servercomm-local' Running
Program 'servercomm-main' Status ok
Process 'salt-minion' Running
Process 'postgresql' Running
Process 'peervpn' Running
Process 'ntpd' Running
Process 'exim4' Running
Process 'dnsupdate' Running
Process 'cron' Running
Program 'bucardo-proc' Status ok
Program 'bucardo-sync' Status ok
System 'xxx-yy-zzz-db1-primary' Running
Is this by design, and if so, I'm curious what the rationale is. Obviously it's
not a problem, it just pique's my interest.
--
Paul Theodoropoulos
www.anastrophe.com
--
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
--
Paul Theodoropoulos
www.anastrophe.com
--
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
