Hi,

the problem was fixed in Monit 5.2.4, changelog excerpt:

--8<--
* Randomize the mail message id to prevent duplicates in the case, that
  the same hostname is used on multiple hosts running monit and messages
  are generated in the same second in parallel. Thanks to Sergey B
  Kirpichev.
--8<--

Best regards,
Martin


> On 18 Oct 2017, at 16:43, Eric Pailleau <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> yes I will do if I got confirmation this is a monit issue for monit guys.
> thanks.
> 
> 
> Le 18/10/2017 à 16:35, SZÉPE Viktor a écrit :
>> Try reporting it on Bitbucket: 
>> https://bitbucket.org/tildeslash/monit/issues/new 
>> 
>> 
>> Idézem/Quoting Eric Pailleau <[email protected]>: 
>> 
>>> Hi Viktor, 
>>> yes I know this.  but I wonder if this message id is forged by monit or 
>>> not. 
>>> If monit create this id , this need more entropy. 
>>> 1508333561.0  1508333561.1 etc...  in same second, at least. 
>>> 
>>> monit guys may know if this issue is solved in upper version or not, too. 
>>> regards 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le 18/10/2017 à 16:17, SZÉPE Viktor a écrit : 
>>>>> message-id=<[email protected]> 
>>>> 
>>>> It seems to be a timestamp based ID which it not precise enough for your 
>>>> case. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Idézem/Quoting Eric Pailleau <[email protected]>: 
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello, 
>>>>> forgot to mention that we use (quiet old ?) monit 5.2.3 
>>>>> but why change something running like a charm ;) ? 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Le 18/10/2017 à 15:46, Eric Pailleau a écrit : 
>>>>>> Hello, 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I encountered a monit alert mail issue. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I use simple config : 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> check file no_acks with path /path/to/no_acks.log 
>>>>>>         if match ".*" then alert 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So that monit effetively send a mail at each entry in this log. 
>>>>>> So far so good. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But since we changed mail architecture, we did not received all the 
>>>>>> mails, 
>>>>>> but, by investigating , only the first one of all in the same second 
>>>>>> (using monit.log timestamp reference) 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We could find that imapd/cyrus  removed duplicate message ids and could 
>>>>>> add a special config entry disabling this option. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Indeed we could see in postfix/smtpd that all the mails was relayed, but 
>>>>>> all in the same second add same ID : 
>>>>>> example : 
>>>>>> Oct 18 15:32:41 sv1 postfix/cleanup[31715]: 9AE25A87C51: 
>>>>>> message-id=<*1508333561.0*@mydomain.net> 
>>>>>> Oct 18 15:32:41 sv1 postfix/cleanup[31715]: A59FDA87C3D: 
>>>>>> message-id=<*1508333561.0*@mydomain.net> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It is not clear to me if this is a monit or postfix issue. Is this mail 
>>>>>> id set by monit or postfix ? 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for sharing any thoughts on this. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards 
>>>>>> Eric 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> SZÉPE Viktor, honlap üzemeltetés 
>>>> https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/blob/master/CV.md 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> SZÉPE Viktor, honlap üzemeltetés 
>> https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/blob/master/CV.md 
> 
> 
> -- 
> <Signature-EP.jpg>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe:
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general


-- 
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general

Reply via email to