> Am 01.04.2022 um 12:23 schrieb SZÉPE Viktor <[email protected]>:
>
> Idézem/Quoting Tino Hendricks <[email protected]>:
>
>>> Am 01.04.2022 um 09:50 schrieb SZÉPE Viktor <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> Idézem/Quoting Tino Hendricks <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>
>>>> Dear list,
>>>>
>>>> I’m trying to monitor an USB port.
>>>>
>>>> The script „checkUSB.sh“ returns „error“ or „exists“ (successfully tested
>>>> in Terminal as root).
>>>>
>>>> Monit runs as root but with
>>>>
>>>> check program checkUSB with path "/usr/local/sbin/checkUSB.sh"
>>>> if content != "exists" then alert
>>>>
>>>> never returns. The process runs forever and is then killed by timeout.
>>>
>>> Hello Tino!
>>>
>>> Checks run under the same user as Monit.
>>> You could debug it with
>>> logger $(whoami)
>>> in your script or with monit status command.
>>
>> Hello Viktor,
>>
>> thank you so much for your reply!
>>
>> Monit runs as root, and so does the script (like in my tests).
>> I can see it on my conole:
>>
>> root 13052 0.0 0.0 1940 384 ? Ss 10:54 0:00 /bin/sh
>> /usr/local/sbin/checkUSB.sh
>> root 13055 0.0 0.0 1940 68 ? S 10:54 0:00 /bin/sh
>> /usr/local/sbin/checkUSB.sh
>>
>> Any more ideas?
>
> As I cannot see what is inside the script it is not possible to help.
I’m sorry, it’s not a secret:
#!/bin/sh
# test for existence and readability of ttyUSB
logger $(whoami)
PORT=`more /etc/gammu-smsdrc |grep tty|cut -d ' ' -f 3|cut -d '/' -f 3`
RESULT=`ls -l /dev/tty*|grep $PORT`
if [ -z "$RESULT" ]
then
echo "error"
else
echo "exists"
fi
exit 0
And now I recognized that using „more“ instead of „cat“ of course is a bad idea
if not running in an interactive terminal. 🙄
Thank you so much for pushing me into the right direction!
Tino
