Hi, On 05/11/2014 04:54 PM, jf wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for this long, long, long delay. I've been very busy for other > matters... > > I upgraded to version 3.5.1, and the issue is still present. > > I see nothing revelant in /var/log/monitorix : > Use of uninitialized value $pnum in string ne at > /usr/lib/monitorix/port.pm line 507.
Can you, please, specify which OS have you there? Also, can you paste the <port> block of your configuration file? > readline() on closed filehandle IN at /usr/lib/monitorix/int.pm line > 826. > readline() on closed filehandle IN at /usr/lib/monitorix/fs.pm line 716. > Use of uninitialized value $write_cnt in addition (+) at > /usr/lib/monitorix/fs.pm line 763. > Use of uninitialized value $write_sec in addition (+) at > /usr/lib/monitorix/fs.pm line 764. > Use of uninitialized value $read_sec in addition (+) at > /usr/lib/monitorix/fs.pm line 764. > readline() on closed filehandle IN at /usr/lib/monitorix/fs.pm line 716. > Use of uninitialized value $write_cnt in addition (+) at > /usr/lib/monitorix/fs.pm line 763. > Use of uninitialized value $write_sec in addition (+) at > /usr/lib/monitorix/fs.pm line 764. > Use of uninitialized value $read_sec in addition (+) at > /usr/lib/monitorix/fs.pm line 764. Can you paste the <fs> block of your configuration file? > > About firewall, yes, I have some basic iptables rules, and I noticed > that my script deleted all rules before applying my own ones. So, it > deleted some rules added by Monitorix. > Now, I restarted monitorix, and its rules reappeared : > > # iptables-save > ... > :monitorix_IN_0 - [0:0] > :monitorix_IN_1 - [0:0] > :monitorix_IN_2 - [0:0] > :monitorix_IN_3 - [0:0] > :monitorix_IN_4 - [0:0] > :monitorix_IN_5 - [0:0] > :monitorix_IN_6 - [0:0] > :monitorix_IN_7 - [0:0] > :monitorix_IN_8 - [0:0] > :monitorix_OUT_1 - [0:0] > ... Do not save the Monitorix rules, they are created and removed automatically everytime you start and stop Monitorix. > > But, after more than 1/2 hour, the port graphs are still empty (they > seem to be generated, but show now traffic on ports, even if I'm sure > there is some traffic on these ports). > > Any ideas? > # iptables -nxvL INPUT should say you the current traffic accounting for each port in the INPUT chain. > Thanks! > Let me know. Regards. -- Jordi Sanfeliu FIBRANET Network Services Provider http://www.fibranet.cat ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Monitorix-general mailing list Monitorix-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monitorix-general
