On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> wrote: > When sending a patch, the quality of commit messages are very important > and should be checked just as carefully as the patch itself. Time and > time again we look back on our project and these messages are the first > thing we look at to know what on earth is going on and why such change > was made. As monkeyd grows in commits and contributors, this becomes > increasingly important. > > Eduardo, Jonathan and other patch reviewers including myself: lets start > paying more attention to this type of thing. > > Somewhat useful doc: > http://who-t.blogspot.com.es/2009/12/on-commit-messages.html > > Cheers, > Davidlohr > > _______________________________________________ > Monkey mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.monkey-project.com/listinfo/monkey
Hi Dave, thanks for put this topic on the table, i think that is very important that we improve our commit messages and continue working hard in the best practices about how do we perform our work over the project. That means that patches that do not follow *the rule* will be rejected, but lets work a little bit on that and document how do we like the patches, that means improve our documentation also. Any person committing to Monkey repository, please read carefully that document, our new guide :) thanks again! -- Eduardo Silva http://edsiper.linuxchile.cl http://www.monkey-project.com _______________________________________________ Monkey mailing list [email protected] http://lists.monkey-project.com/listinfo/monkey
