Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=75246 --- shadow/75246 2005-06-13 16:02:03.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/75246.tmp.25621 2005-06-13 16:56:21.000000000 -0400 @@ -112,6 +112,25 @@ managed code, but I'm not enough familiar with the runtime (and I'm afraid most of the work must be done there). Note: I have not verified this yet !! But I'm pretty sure lots (?) of our AssemblyName tests (if they're not disabled)fail on MS.NET 1.x (and definitely on 2.0) + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-13 16:56 ------- +Gert, the manual vs created AssemblyName may be difference (it's worth +investigating). As for the other comments: + +* the null versus [0] array happens on both 1.x and 2.0 runtime (see +AssemblyNameTest.Self test case). There may be other differences/cases +but I'm not aware of them. + +* (with one recent exception) all the AssemblyName tests runs +successfully on both Mono 1.1.x and MS 1.x (I just tested then again +to be 100% sure). All tests _were_ working with 2.0 prior to beta2 but +it seems no one has yet taken the time to update the test suite since +beta2 was released. I'll update AssemblyNameTest ASAP. + +* most of this can be (and should be) dealt in managed code (e.g. it +much easier to have 1.x/2.0 behavior differences there). + +Your help is always appreciated. Thanks :-) _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
