Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=75555 --- shadow/75555 2005-07-15 06:22:14.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/75555.tmp.28265 2005-07-15 06:22:14.000000000 -0400 @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +Bug#: 75555 +Product: Mono: Class Libraries +Version: 1.1 +OS: Red Hat 9.0 +OS Details: Fedora Core +Status: NEW +Resolution: +Severity: +Priority: Wishlist +Component: VB Runtime +AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +TargetMilestone: --- +URL: +Cc: +Summary: Not fully implemented the Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace + +Description of Problem: +It seems that the Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace is not fully implemented +under Mono for Linux. + + +Steps to reproduce the problem: +I found different behaviors of following methods: Val, FileOpen. I'm +afraid of more unexpected bugs with not implementd methods. + +Actual Results: + + +Expected Results: +I'm expecting that all classes/methods/functions from +Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace have the same behavior that their +equivalents in Microsoft's .NET. + +How often does this happen? +When application calls not implemented method. + +Additional Information: +Inside my source I have the hundreds references to Val, LCase, InStr, +Replace, Dir, Today, Str, Len, Format, Now, Trim, Kill, CopyFile and other +methods from this namespace. +The main problem is that I don't know which else from this namespace +doesn't work (or work different that expected). This implies that my +application can run unpredictable when something run different that should +be. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
