Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=75954 --- shadow/75954 2005-09-01 13:08:07.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/75954.tmp.19944 2005-09-01 15:44:11.000000000 -0400 @@ -65,6 +65,19 @@ actually send out Rename events. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-01 12:59 ------- Created an attachment (id=15679) mcs/class/System/System.IO/InotifyWatcher.cs [take 2] + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-01 15:44 ------- + fprintf(stderr, "Inotify not supported! You need a " + "2.6.13 kernel or later with CONFIG_INOTIFY " + "enabled."); + +Probably shouldn't do that. Building on a machine with inotify support +but running on a kernel without it should not be a bug, generate a +warning, etc. + +In fact, it'd be sorta nice if we could build inotify support on a +machine *without* inotify in the kernel -- all our rpms are built on +rh9, which obviously doesn't have support. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
