Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=75351 --- shadow/75351 2005-09-21 03:01:40.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/75351.tmp.24709 2005-11-03 17:30:07.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ Bug#: 75351 Product: Mono: Class Libraries Version: 1.1 OS: GNU/Linux [Other] OS Details: Gentoo 2005.0 running mono 1.1.7 -Status: RESOLVED -Resolution: FIXED +Status: REOPENED +Resolution: Severity: Unknown Priority: Major Component: System AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @@ -117,6 +117,16 @@ IPEndPoint myEP = new IPEndPoint(Dns.Resolve(Dns.GetHostName()).AddressList[0], 9999); and your test works fine with current svn head (may be 1.1.9 too). Thanks. + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-03 17:30 ------- +Well, yes of course it works if you change the code as you describe, +because then it's not sending UDP broadcast packets, it's sending +normal unicast direct to the port. That's why I left the +commented-out line in there, to demonstrate the difference in +behaviour between unicast and broadcast. + +The bug as I described it is still present in 1.1.9.2. + _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
