Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=76692

--- shadow/76692        2005-11-13 11:47:20.000000000 -0500
+++ shadow/76692.tmp.7549       2005-11-13 12:51:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -73,6 +73,17 @@
 The behavioral difference comes from the default warning level
 difference between mcs and csc. mcs defaults the warning level to 3,
 but csc seems to have something like "default". In the default state,
 csc still reports those warnings, but currently we have no way to do
 it inside mcs.
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-13 12:51 -------
+Hmm, I think you misunderstood the note I added to the "Actual 
+results" section. 
+
+None of the warnings mentioned in that section should be reported. 
+The note just lists the cases where mcs is working OK (that might 
+have caused the confusion). It only fails when the referenced method 
+is protected AND has arguments.
+
+The bug report is about the two warnings that are being reported.
_______________________________________________
mono-bugs maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs

Reply via email to