Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=76674 --- shadow/76674 2005-12-15 17:04:08.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/76674.tmp.28433 2005-12-15 17:15:12.000000000 -0500 @@ -588,6 +588,30 @@ Thanks. Jordi, ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-15 17:04 ------- Created an attachment (id=16218) 50 lines GraphicsPath test case + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-15 17:15 ------- +Please, consult the new attachment it is a 50 lines test case. +If you execute this several times on Windows the output should be: +mono TestCase.exe +Time needed:00:00:00.1910000 + +And if you execute the same on Linux (e.g. Suse 10), you will obtain +something like this: +time mono TestCase.exe +Time needed: 00:00:01.2310000 + +real 0m1.493s +user 0m0.208s +sys 0m0.624s + +The problem to me is definitely the CPU usage. I am only passing a +very small test case to you. In the real application we have to render +thousands of polygons, not just two. In Windows this is being done +within milliseconds and normally in Linux, too. Only, if in Linux some +GraphicsPath are extremely zoomed instead of milliseconds the Linux +version needs several minutes (!) to render everything. + +BTW: a call to Graphics.Clip (Region) seems to improve performance a bit. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
