Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77093 --- shadow/77093 2006-01-05 04:42:41.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/77093.tmp.21907 2006-01-05 05:00:40.000000000 -0500 @@ -46,6 +46,25 @@ It's just an implementation difference, and if it were up to me we'd avoid these differences (where it somehow makes sense, and doesn't introduce bugs or weird behaviour), but clearly it's not ;-) It would be great if you'd reconsider your decision, but if not: no prob ! + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-05 05:00 ------- +Exactly. MS.NET 2.0 behavior does not break the specification, as I +mentioned. + +I believe that no one feels either happy or unhappy about this trivial +difference. + +We *could* reopen this bug, but I dare not do it; if we keep every +"implementation difference" things open in this bugzilla, those who +want to find *real* bugs would be annoyed in front of the flood of +those almost-meaningless information. + +However if you still think it would be great to be fixed, then as a +first matter it is a bug in MS.NET which meaninglessly breaks +"compatibility" between 1.x and 2.0, depending on speakers who speaks +"compatibility". The best is to let Microsoft guys to fix this "bug" +in the next 2.0 SP (you know, compatibilities are easily lost when +they release any SPs), by that the compatibility "bug" could be fixed. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
