Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77315 --- shadow/77315 2006-01-23 04:23:13.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/77315.tmp.21360 2006-01-23 09:16:13.000000000 -0500 @@ -125,6 +125,16 @@ #endif // MS Fx 1.1 accept this // [ExpectedException (typeof (DecoderException))] public void T5_IllegalCodePosition_1_UTF16Surrogates_511 () { + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-23 09:16 ------- +On a personal level I much prefer the RFC but compatibility is also +important - which is why I commented the original expected exceptions +in the tests. + +Now today it's clear that the RFC is better as MS fixed this in 2.0 - +which would lead, anyway, to incompatibilities between 1.x and 2.0 +code. But there's always the risk that existing code could depend on +this (but in this case I doubt it). _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
