Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77191 --- shadow/77191 2006-01-29 06:19:18.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/77191.tmp.16273 2006-01-31 14:10:04.000000000 -0500 @@ -338,6 +338,14 @@ like in the second patch. Otherwise the server won't be able to lookup methods having an overload not seen by the client (like the protected Dispose(bool) method in Alex' sample). And the special case Object.FieldGetter/Setter () must be handled too. Do you agree? + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-31 14:10 ------- +What if: +* The client uses reflection to call a private remote method. +* The client calls an interface method which is not overloaded, but +which is overloaded (and public) in the remote implementation class. + +This needs further research. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
