Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77500 --- shadow/77500 2006-02-08 03:52:53.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/77500.tmp.8981 2006-02-08 04:08:53.000000000 -0500 @@ -80,6 +80,19 @@ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 03:52 ------- I haven't tried but the patch looks good to handle enums. I don't think mixing test addition and replacing Assertion->Assert is good. + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 04:08 ------- +If you're parsing, for example, a delimited enum string then it +makes more sense to say which part is not valid but when you're +recreating one from a numerical value its not. + +If a bit-field enum which has the following fields 1, 2, 3 (which do +not make sense ofcourse) and you pass value 8, then it makes more +sense to say that '8' is an invalid value instead of '4', no ? + +About mixing test addition and replacing Assertion->Assert: you're +right, I should've split this up. But then again, I can hardly +submit a bug report for Assertion -> Assert ;-) _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
