Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=62673 --- shadow/62673 2006-03-22 11:35:16.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/62673.tmp.11028 2006-03-22 14:01:19.000000000 -0500 @@ -86,6 +86,22 @@ My guess for (2) is that its possible that auto-generated code (say, Winforms) might assign more variables than are actually used in a winforms application. The extra warnings that we will report will likely hide real problematic warnings in my opinion. + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-22 14:01 ------- +I think we don't need to mimic every bug in csc compiler. I think +Microsoft testers simply don't pay so much attention to warnings. +They fixed a few of them in version 2.0 but even the newly introduced +have 'holes' and don't catch all cases. + +I really don't understand why they don't report warning for this (but +variable is not emitted). + + public A(string name) + { + string name2 = name; + } + +I will try to report it as a defect. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
