Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77324 --- shadow/77324 2006-03-28 11:36:57.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/77324.tmp.26795 2006-03-28 11:45:59.000000000 -0500 @@ -244,6 +244,17 @@ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-28 11:36 ------- Dick, that sounds like a good solution. We cant anticipate every possible symbol in an OS, so this seems like a NOTABUG in Mono (if anything, a bug should be filed at Apple about this issue in their toolchain). + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-28 11:45 ------- +Hmmm, that "solution" sounds really strange to me, and it's easy to anticipate that other +developers will have similar problems. To me it's a design weakness to use a symbol which +is already present in a system API of the target OS. + +It's clear that i could recompile mono using my own definitions but it's not a good option. +My goal is to ship an application in binary form which works for normal users with their +normal Mono installation under OSX (and other platforms where this is already working). +The only workaround would be to provide a tweaked private mono framework inside the +application bundle. Doesn't sound very elegant to me. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
