Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=78220 --- shadow/78220 2006-04-28 03:35:47.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/78220.tmp.13075 2006-04-28 03:41:01.000000000 -0400 @@ -130,6 +130,16 @@ continue ·assessment·: see ·lax assessment·. In that case both the Mono and MS implementation are valid, right ? However, when you explicitly compile an XML Schema I (personally) would expect a failure when a sub component is missing. + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-28 03:41 ------- +MS implementation does not prohibit missing sub components. In some +(well, many) cases MS.NET has bugs, which we are not cloning. My xsd +implementation strategy is simple: MS seems to allow missing sub +components, so we also allow them. I think it is fair enough. + +When the schemas are added in schema2->schema1 order, components in +schema2 should not be regarded as missing. Thus the code you first +posted is absolutely a bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
