Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=78075 --- shadow/78075 2006-05-01 20:12:09.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/78075.tmp.12920 2006-05-02 16:30:35.000000000 -0400 @@ -419,6 +419,50 @@ negotiated during the SSL/TLS handshake. That way you'll be sure if it's AES256 or (I really doubt) something else. Side note: we do not share the same definition of "order of magnitude" because in mine: 1 order of magnitude == 10x, 2 order of magnitude == 100x ... ;-) + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 16:30 ------- +In order: + +>I'm not sure how you can compare (or interpret the results from) ZLM +>times versus wget times. + +installing the testing rpm from the cache takes 7 seconds. hence, +"time rug bin -y <rpm>" and "time wget" (assuming James confirms that +we are not reading the download byte by byte or doing something +equally silly) is rather comparable. + + -> James, can you comment on mget vs zlm ? I also still need to know +that we are not doing weird things in the download code. + +>You can also use ethereal (on a smaller RPM) to see which cipher +> gets negotiated during the SSL/TLS handshake. That way you'll be +> sure if it's AES256 or (I really doubt) something else. + +I use openssl in client mode to check what cypher is being used, and +did so for all the results posted - when I say one cypher was used, it +was. As far as the default is concerned, I did explicitly test with +AES 128 and it had the same low performance as did the default. + +The default choice turns out to be "Cipher is EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA". +The 37 second figure I posted above is, as I stated already, with RC4-SHA. + +-> Sebastien, can you comment on the why I would not be able to +compare download via rug/zlm vs wget ? As I stated, I am accounting +for the fixed "estra" part of the process (install, etc), and all the +other variables are kept the same. + +> Side note: we do not share the same definition of "order of +> magnitude" because in mine: 1 order of magnitude == 10x, 2 order of +> magnitude == 100x ... ;-) + +Go figure, I also thought the same. And 7 seconds, 37 seconds, 2m7sec +(127 seconds) are *indeed* in three different orders, the powers of +ten 0, 1 and 2. + + + + + _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
