Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=78351

--- shadow/78351        2006-05-10 07:02:14.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/78351.tmp.24997      2006-05-10 07:48:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 78351
 Product: Mono: Class Libraries
 Version: 1.1
 OS: unknown
 OS Details: WinXP and Linux Ubuntu
-Status: RESOLVED   
-Resolution: NOTABUG
+Status: REOPENED   
+Resolution: 
 Severity: Unknown
 Priority: Normal
 Component: Windows.Forms
 AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                            
 ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]               
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@@ -65,6 +65,18 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-10 07:02 -------
 I haven't verified that it works (MS.NET compiled assembly under 
 Mono runtime -> resources doesn't work). I asked a question if Mono 
 can't be used to execute assemblies compiled in MS.NET. If that's 
 the case, I think Mono lost some usability.
+
+------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-10 07:48 -------
+Ok, so your description is confused. What you should have clarified is:
+
+- compile the executable with .NET 2.0 csc
+- run it with mono
+
+in the "Steps to reproduce the problem" section.
+
+As I wrote, it works just fine when it is built using make with
+Makefile generated by prj2make, some detailed procedure on how the
+executable was built is required.
_______________________________________________
mono-bugs maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs

Reply via email to