Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=75572 --- shadow/75572 2005-09-05 13:52:38.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/75572.tmp.13874 2006-05-21 15:53:42.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ Bug#: 75572 Product: Mono: Debugger Version: unspecified -OS: +OS: unknown OS Details: Status: NEW Resolution: -Severity: +Severity: Unknown Priority: Normal Component: backend AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TargetMilestone: --- @@ -18,6 +18,25 @@ the debugger assumes that a local variable is alive from the start to finish of the enclosing lexical block, which might not always be the case. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-05 13:52 ------- reassigning to new debugger owner. + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 15:53 ------- +I'm not sure if this is exactly the same, but consider the following code: + +1 public class Foo { +2 public static void Main() { +3 int j = 0; +4 for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { +5 j += i; +6 } +7 for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { +8 j += i; +9 } +10 } +11 } + +Using mono, debugger from svn, I put a breakpoint at 8. Using the +debugger I inspect the variable "i" at the breakpoint, it is always 0, +even though j advances properly. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
