Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=78241

--- shadow/78241        2006-05-25 12:49:56.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/78241.tmp.8129       2006-05-29 05:45:03.000000000 -0400
@@ -762,6 +762,24 @@
         [0x40017b3d]
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-25 12:49 -------
 I've already fixed the DeleteCriticalSection abort.  The other part
 I'll look into now.
+
+------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-29 05:45 -------
+I cannot reproduce the segfault from null.exe with my x86 (non 64 bit)
+NPTL system.
+It seems that xsp doesn't leaks mcs process anymore! thanks dick!
+I will test it on our "preproduction" machines to see if there's any
+drawbacks!
+
+Just another question if I do a CTRL-C on a mono process, is handle is
+not deleted, we can see that there's many second that it hasn't respond 
+(here 844)
+
+ 4 (  1) [Process]  844 Un ([          TestProcess.exe] pid: 27517
+exit: 0)
+  5 (  1) [ Thread]  844 Un (proc: 27517, tid: -1210509632, state: 0,
+exit: 0, join: 0)
+
+I just want to know when this handle would be really deleted?
_______________________________________________
mono-bugs maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs

Reply via email to