Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=78642 --- shadow/78642 2006-06-14 07:10:48.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/78642.tmp.4781 2006-06-14 07:37:43.000000000 -0400 @@ -2,13 +2,13 @@ Product: Mono: Runtime Version: 1.0 OS: Red Hat 9.0 OS Details: Linux skif 2.4.27 #1 SMP Thu Apr 14 15:25:11 MSD 2005 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux Status: NEW Resolution: -Severity: +Severity: Unknown Priority: Wishlist Component: JIT AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TargetMilestone: --- @@ -141,6 +141,45 @@ So Micosoft .NET outperforms Mono approximately (considering different processors) in 15 times ! How often does this happen? Always + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-14 07:37 ------- +Why on earth you compare performance on very different machines? The +bug report smells INVALID. + +Here is what I got on the *same* machine, on cygwin: + +$ csc 78642.cs +Microsoft(R) Visual C# 2005 Compiler version 8.00.50727.42 +for Microsoft(R) Windows(R) 2005 Framework version 2.0.50727 +Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 2001-2005. All rights reserved. + + [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/tests +$ !./ +./78642.exe +Elapsed time =0.5908496 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/tests +$ !mono +mono ./78642.exe +Elapsed time =0.651 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/tests +$ gmcs 78642.cs +78642.cs(6,17): warning CS0168: The variable `k' is declared but never +used +Compilation succeeded - 1 warning(s) + [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/tests +$ !./ +./78642.exe +Elapsed time =0.2103024 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/tests +$ !mono +mono ./78642.exe +Elapsed time =0.23 + _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
