Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=78611 --- shadow/78611 2006-06-14 08:21:20.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/78611.tmp.5350 2006-06-14 08:21:20.000000000 -0400 @@ -0,0 +1,278 @@ +Bug#: 78611 +Product: Mono: Class Libraries +Version: unspecified +OS: unknown +OS Details: Windows XP SP2 +Status: NEW +Resolution: +Severity: Unknown +Priority: Normal +Component: Sys.XML +AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +TargetMilestone: --- +URL: +Cc: +Summary: Exception at SoapHttpClientProtocol constructor (in MS.NET it works) + +I have a very simple C# project created with VS2005 that only contains a +web reference to a web service that I am developing. + +If I make a very simple testcase using a console application that only +creates an instance of the main class of this project, .NET runs it without +problems but Mono throws the following exception: + +C:\Apl\IRM4\src\Client\Tests\Debug +Tests\TestConsoleLauncher\bin\Debug>"C:\Archivos de +programa\Mono-1.1.15\bin\mono.exe" TestConsoleLauncher.exe + +Unhandled Exception: System.InvalidOperationException: IsNullable may not +be 'true' for value type System.Nullable`1[[System.Int32, mscorlib, +Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089]] in +member 'updateId' in <0x00621> +System.Xml.Serialization.XmlReflectionImporter:ImportElementInfo +(System.Type cls, System.String defaultName, System.String +defaultNamespace, System.Type defaultType, +System.Xml.Serialization.XmlTypeMapMemberElement member, Sys +tem.Xml.Serialization.XmlAttributes atts) +in <0x00a95> System.Xml.Serialization.XmlReflectionImporter:CreateMapMember +(System.Type declaringType, System.Xml.Serialization.XmlReflectionMember +rmember, System.String defaultNamespace) +in <0x00069> +System.Xml.Serialization.XmlReflectionImporter:ImportMembersMapping + (System.String elementName, System.String ns, +System.Xml.Serialization.XmlRefle +ctionMember[] members, Boolean hasWrapperElement) +in <0x0063b> System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapMethodStubInfo:.ctor +(System.Web.Services.Protocols.TypeStubInfo typeStub, +System.Web.Services.Protocols.LogicalMethodInfo source, System.Object kind, +System.Xml.Serialization.XmlReflectionImporter xmlImporter, +System.Xml.Serialization.SoapReflectionImporter soapImporter) +in <0x000c0> +System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapTypeStubInfo:CreateMethodStubInfo + (System.Web.Services.Protocols.TypeStubInfo parent, +System.Web.Services.Protocols.LogicalMethodInfo lmi, Boolean isClientProxy) +in <0x000f7> System.Web.Services.Protocols.TypeStubInfo:BuildTypeMethods () +in <0x00012> System.Web.Services.Protocols.TypeStubInfo:Initialize () +in <0x00065> +System.Web.Services.Protocols.LogicalTypeInfo:CreateTypeStubInfo +(System.Type type) +in <0x00056> System.Web.Services.Protocols.LogicalTypeInfo:GetTypeStub +(System.String protocolName) +in <0x0001b> System.Web.Services.Protocols.TypeStubManager:GetTypeStub +(System.Type t, System.String protocolName) +in <0x00023> System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol:.ctor () +in <0x00013> WebServiceReferences.IRM_WebServer.IRM_WS:.ctor () +in (wrapper remoting-invoke-with-check) +WebServiceReferences.IRM_WebServer.IRM_WS:.ctor () +in <0x00022> TestConsoleLauncher.Program:Main (System.String[] args) + + +The small testcase console project only contains the following code: + +using System; +using System.Collections.Generic; +using System.Text; + +using System.IO; + +namespace TestConsoleLauncher +{ + class Program + { + static void Main(string[] args) + { + WebServiceReferences.IRM_WebServer.IRM_WS oWebServer = + new WebServiceReferences.IRM_WebServer.IRM_WS(); + } + } +} + +The references of the project are: +System +System.Data +System.Web.Services +WebServiceReferences (this is the assembly that I have mentioned that only +contains a web reference to a webservice). + +If you need the DLL of the WebServiceReferences assembly, I will see if I +can post it here. + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-08 08:06 ------- +Changing priority to Normal. + +It seems a bug in System.Xml so reassigning Component. + +The exception is telling something about a field called updateId, so +here is a code snippet from the References.cs file that contains all +the references to this parameter: + + + +//------------------------------------------------------------------------------ +// <auto-generated> +// This code was generated by a tool. +// Runtime Version:2.0.50727.42 +// +// Changes to this file may cause incorrect behavior and will be +lost if +// the code is regenerated. +// </auto-generated> +//------------------------------------------------------------------------------ + +// +// This source code was auto-generated by Microsoft.VSDesigner, +Version 2.0.50727.42. +// +#pragma warning disable 1591 + +namespace WebServiceReferences.IRM_WebServer { + using System.Diagnostics; + using System.Web.Services; + using System.ComponentModel; + using System.Web.Services.Protocols; + using System; + using System.Xml.Serialization; + + + /// <remarks/> + +[System.CodeDom.Compiler.GeneratedCodeAttribute("System.Web.Services", +"2.0.50727.42")] + [System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThroughAttribute()] + [System.ComponentModel.DesignerCategoryAttribute("code")] + [System.Web.Services.WebServiceBindingAttribute(Name="IRM_WSSoap", +Namespace="http://tempuri.org/";)] + public partial class IRM_WS : +System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol { + + private System.Threading.SendOrPostCallback +ExistsClientOperationCompleted; + + private System.Threading.SendOrPostCallback +GetTerminalOperationCompleted; + + + +(...) + + + + +[System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapDocumentMethodAttribute("http://tempuri.org/InsertUpdateEvent";, +RequestNamespace="http://tempuri.org/";, +ResponseNamespace="http://tempuri.org/";, +Use=System.Web.Services.Description.SoapBindingUse.Literal, +ParameterStyle=System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapParameterStyle.Wrapped)] + public int InsertUpdateEvent(int idSeverity, EventUpdateCode +idEvent, string applicationName, string messageDescription, +[System.Xml.Serialization.XmlElementAttribute(IsNullable=true)] +System.Nullable<int> updateId, System.DateTime originatedDate, string +guid) { + object[] results = this.Invoke("InsertUpdateEvent", new +object[] { + idSeverity, + idEvent, + applicationName, + messageDescription, + updateId, + originatedDate, + guid}); + return ((int)(results[0])); + } + + /// <remarks/> + public void InsertUpdateEventAsync(int idSeverity, +EventUpdateCode idEvent, string applicationName, string +messageDescription, System.Nullable<int> updateId, System.DateTime +originatedDate, string guid) { + this.InsertUpdateEventAsync(idSeverity, idEvent, +applicationName, messageDescription, updateId, originatedDate, guid, +null); + } + + /// <remarks/> + public void InsertUpdateEventAsync(int idSeverity, +EventUpdateCode idEvent, string applicationName, string +messageDescription, System.Nullable<int> updateId, System.DateTime +originatedDate, string guid, object userState) { + if ((this.InsertUpdateEventOperationCompleted == null)) { + this.InsertUpdateEventOperationCompleted = new +System.Threading.SendOrPostCallback(this.OnInsertUpdateEventOperationCompleted); + } + this.InvokeAsync("InsertUpdateEvent", new object[] { + idSeverity, + idEvent, + applicationName, + messageDescription, + updateId, + originatedDate, + guid}, +this.InsertUpdateEventOperationCompleted, userState); + } + + + +(...) + + + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-09 04:55 ------- +The problem is here: + +http://svn.myrealbox.com/viewcvs/trunk/mcs/class/System.XML/System.Xml.Serialization/XmlReflectionImporter.cs?view=markup + +if (elem.IsNullable && elem.TypeData.IsValueType) + throw new InvalidOperationException ("IsNullable may not be 'true' +for value type " + elem.TypeData.FullTypeName + " in member '" + +defaultName + "'"); + + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-09 05:41 ------- +Original condition: + +if (elem.IsNullable && elem.TypeData.IsValueType) + +New one: + +if (elem.IsNullable && + (!elem.TypeData.FullTypeName.ToString().Contains("System.Nullable")) + && elem.TypeData.IsValueType) + +Would it be acceptable this change? + +If I am on the right direction, perhaps this patch is a little +"hacky", I wonder if it can be done this way: + +(!elem.TypeData.Type is System.Nullable) + +Thanks in advance. + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-09 06:54 ------- +Just wondering again... (have not tested it yet): + +if (elem.IsNullable && elem.TypeData.IsValueType){ + boolean nullable = false; + foreach(Type interface in elem.TypeData.Type.GetInterfaces()){ + if (interface is INullableValue){ + nullable = true; + break; + } + } + if (!nullable){ + throw new InvalidOperationException ("Type " + +elem.TypeData.FullTypeName + " in member '" + +defaultName + "' does not implement INullableValue"); + } +} + + +And something like this?? + + + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-14 08:21 ------- +It's not just a matter of finding a workaround for the crash. If +serialization of such type is allowed as nullable, it may need other +changes in the serializer. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
