Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=78597 --- shadow/78597 2006-06-23 23:01:06.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/78597.tmp.21450 2006-06-24 11:53:41.000000000 -0400 @@ -227,6 +227,22 @@ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-23 23:01 ------- Hi Sebastien! I will check that. I'm reinstalling my development box so I think it could take a little longer. Sorry for any problem. :( + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-24 11:53 ------- +Michael, no the current code isn't in SVN, won't be until it's been +tested, and won't be tested until re-negotiation works (testing SSL is +a long process and history has proven that it's not enough). However I +can make a binary and/or a patch available for debugging the issue. + +As for ReadInt32, my test is a big, endless, loop (of the the npgsql +SSL test tool in SVN). It's executed hundreds of times (if not +thousands) before the renegotitation and ReadInt32 never receive 0 +before the re-negotiation. + +Fx, don't be sorry because the bug may not be in your code at all ;-) +Right now the BufferedStream makes it harder to debug under VS.NET as +I somewhat loose track of the data. Any light you can shed on the +"bad/extra" data would be very useful. Thanks. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
