Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=78972 --- shadow/78972 2006-08-07 05:18:39.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/78972.tmp.5726 2006-08-07 05:39:54.000000000 -0400 @@ -87,6 +87,23 @@ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-07 05:18 ------- Created an attachment (id=17409) The last missing libraries + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-07 05:39 ------- +Sorry for the missing libraries. They are standard runtime libraries +in my environment, and I forgot about them. +I re-built the test in a clean-room environment, I found out that two +extra libraries were indeed missing and they are now attached. + +About the missing SENTINEL byte, this is the only case in which there +must not be any. +As a matter of fact, according to ECMA-335 3rd edition, partition II, +page 156 (almost at the bottom of the page): +"In the unusual case that a call site supplies no extra arguments, the +signature shall not include a SENTINEL..." + +The call to foo:foo in test.exe does not supply any extra argument. +Is maybe the problem that Mono always expects the SENTINEL byte? + _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
