Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=79023 --- shadow/79023 2006-08-14 02:21:08.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/79023.tmp.21621 2006-09-01 09:41:06.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ Bug#: 79023 Product: Mono: Class Libraries Version: 1.1 OS: unknown OS Details: -Status: RESOLVED -Resolution: FIXED +Status: REOPENED +Resolution: Severity: Unknown Priority: Wishlist Component: CORLIB AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-14 02:21 ------- Ok, I have applied a different fix, in our case, instead of complicating the actual tests at the beginning, I moved the test inside SetField; It already had special code to try SetProperty later. + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-01 09:41 ------- +It's not been fixed :-) All the tests in TypeTest were disabled due +to the presence of an explicit constructor. + +The code for SetField throws an exception if args.Length != 1. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
