Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=79246 --- shadow/79246 2006-09-08 19:25:09.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/79246.tmp.18295 2006-09-08 19:38:23.000000000 -0400 @@ -340,6 +340,17 @@ Should I go ahead and redo the test cases that have the stride assumption flaw in them to use a pseudo-random number generator with a different seed for each test (so that different pixels are loaded)? If so, then I'll put correct images in place for each test at the same time. + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-08 19:38 ------- +I'm not sure we're 100% understanding each other. If you want to add +new tests, working or "NonWorking", please go ahead. + +If you want to modify "NonWorking" tests to make them 'working', +please attach the patch of the tests changes to this bug report and +I'll review it (and merge it with other local changes have for them). + +As for the "stride assumption flaw" remember that the bug summary is +"Bitmap.LockBits doesn't behave like MS" and some people depend on that. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
