Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=79395

--- shadow/79395        2006-09-13 18:40:34.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/79395.tmp.9111       2006-09-13 18:40:34.000000000 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+Bug#: 79395
+Product: Mono: Class Libraries
+Version: 1.1
+OS: GNU/Linux [Other]
+OS Details: Debian Unstable
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: 
+Priority: Blocker
+Component: System
+AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                            
+ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]               
+QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Cc: 
+Summary: serial port blcoking read with timeout seems broken
+
+Please fill in this template when reporting a bug, unless you know what you
+are doing.
+Description of Problem:
+With the PosixHelper lib (libmono0_1.1.17-2) installed and using:
+read_serial(unixFd, buffer, offset, count, readTimeout)
+to make blocking serial port read calls does not properly honor the
+requested timeout (anymore).
+Also, the behavior of the Parity enumeration has changed, but this appears
+to be intentional (to match .NET2.0)??
+
+Steps to reproduce the problem:
+Do a blocking read with a non-zero timeout when no data has actually been
+received.
+
+Actual Results:
+It blocks forever.
+
+Expected Results:
+It should return with a timeout indication (received character count = 0)
+
+How often does this happen? 
+Every time.
+
+Additional Information:
+A different recent version (libmono0_1.1.17-1) seemed to have a related
+bug, where the read would not block at all (with a non-zero timeout parameter).
_______________________________________________
mono-bugs maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs

Reply via email to