Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=79459 --- shadow/79459 2006-09-21 08:24:27.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/79459.tmp.16439 2006-09-28 10:15:03.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ Bug#: 79459 Product: Mono: Compilers Version: 1.1 -OS: +OS: unknown OS Details: Debian unstable -Status: NEW -Resolution: -Severity: +Status: RESOLVED +Resolution: NOTABUG +Severity: Unknown Priority: Wishlist Component: C# AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TargetMilestone: --- @@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ be a nice addition, IMHO. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-21 08:24 ------- Created an attachment (id=17722) Example program that fails compilation + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-28 10:15 ------- +I disagree. You can always implement A with + + object A.X { return _x; } + _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
