Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=79286

--- shadow/79286        2006-09-26 15:04:25.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/79286.tmp.6156       2006-10-06 12:05:00.000000000 -0400
@@ -3,13 +3,13 @@
 Version: 1.1
 OS: SUSE 9.2
 OS Details: 
 Status: NEW   
 Resolution: 
 Severity: Unknown
-Priority: Minor
+Priority: Major
 Component: misc
 AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                            
 ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]               
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
@@ -110,6 +110,19 @@
 
 Increasing the number of WAPI handles will only delay the inevitable.
 I assume that by "System" you mean a P/Invoke call to some C routine
 that will spawn a program for me. It's a possibility, though it's kind
 of an ugly workaround, and I'm not even sure how to pipe the output
 back to me in that situation without spawning a shell script.
+
+------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-10-06 12:05 -------
+After a while, I can confirm that some of the leaks seem to be going away:
+
+613 (  1) [Process]  348 Un ([           /sbin/ifconfig] pid: 13186
+exit: 0)
+84e (  1) [Process]  123 Sg ([           /sbin/ifconfig] pid:  8511
+exit: 0)
+9f7 (  1) [Process]  123 Sg ([           /sbin/ifconfig] pid: 31128
+exit: 0)
+acc (  1) [Process]  120 Un ([           /sbin/ifconfig] pid: 32303
+exit: 0)
+
_______________________________________________
mono-bugs maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs

Reply via email to