Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=80458 --- shadow/80458 2007-01-05 08:50:33.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/80458.tmp.16779 2007-01-05 08:50:33.000000000 -0500 @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +Bug#: 80458 +Product: Mono: Class Libraries +Version: 1.2 +OS: Windows XP (Cygwin) +OS Details: +Status: NEW +Resolution: +Severity: +Priority: Blocker +Component: Windows.Forms +AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +TargetMilestone: --- +URL: +Cc: +Summary: MWF broken under cygwin + +I dont know when this problem begging but MWF is not working under cygwin, +maybe something in marshaling. After execute any MWF application you have +this error: + +Unhandled Exception: System.ArgumentNullException: Argument cannot be null. + at (wrapper managed-to-native) +System.Windows.Forms.XplatUIWin32:Win32GetMessa +ge (System.Windows.Forms.MSG&,intptr,int,int) + at System.Windows.Forms.XplatUIWin32.GetMessage +(System.Windows.Forms.MSG& msg +, IntPtr hWnd, Int32 wFilterMin, Int32 wFilterMax, Boolean blocking) [0x00000] + at System.Windows.Forms.XplatUIWin32.GetMessage (System.Object queue_id, +Syste +m.Windows.Forms.MSG& msg, IntPtr hWnd, Int32 wFilterMin, Int32 wFilterMax) +[0x00 +000] + at System.Windows.Forms.XplatUI.GetMessage (System.Object queue_id, +System.Win +dows.Forms.MSG& msg, IntPtr hWnd, Int32 wFilterMin, Int32 wFilterMax) [0x00000] + + at System.Windows.Forms.Application.RunLoop (Boolean Modal, +System.Windows.For +ms.ApplicationContext context) [0x00000] + at System.Windows.Forms.Application.Run (System.Windows.Forms.Form +mainForm) [ +0x00000] + at MainForm.Main () [0x00000] + +If you go to XplatUIStructs.cs and comment the line: + + internal object refobject; + +under MSG struct, and comment 2 other lines under XplatUIX11.cs and +X11Internal/X11Display.cs that uses refobject them everything works fine. + +As this refobject was added in r67787 I think that problem is something +when you call pinvoke with bigger MSG struct. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
