Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=80485 --- shadow/80485 2007-01-09 15:28:45.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/80485.tmp.26412 2007-01-10 06:32:44.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ Bug#: 80485 Product: Mono: Tools Version: 1.0 OS: unknown OS Details: debian 3.1 up-to-date -Status: NEEDINFO +Status: REOPENED Resolution: Severity: Unknown Priority: Minor Component: tools AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @@ -80,6 +80,36 @@ - Is there a difference (the way it's built) between the good and bad executable ? - Was this working in earlier version of Mono ? If so which version ? - How many (incorrectly versus correctly signed) other files do you have ? + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-10 06:32 ------- +Greetings, + +* I now noticed, that signcode from yesterday's daily signs incorrecly +all files - even that was correclty signed with stable release. + + +* This file is just Dr.Web anti-virus scanner, it not installs or +somehow modifies yr computer, so you may run it freely :) + + But it is updated with unix zip utility - new virus databases are +packed/updated into it - and stlll it remains windows exe file. Now i +need to sign it after repacking. + +command with which it is updated/created: + +/usr/local/bin/zip -j -u cureit.exe *.vdb + + + + +* I have tried mono 1.1.9, 1.1.10, and 1.2.0 and in all these packages +problem persists. I put 1 file signed correclty and 2 incorrectly to +archive: + +http://www.drweb.com/upload/test_1.1.10.zip +http://www.drweb.com/upload/test_1.1.9.zip +http://www.drweb.com/upload/test_1.2.0rc0.zip + _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
