Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=80344 --- shadow/80344 2007-01-19 11:59:40.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/80344.tmp.5846 2007-01-30 06:28:17.000000000 -0500 @@ -135,6 +135,11 @@ If someone can suggest a rule we can apply here it would be good. The new keyword causes the property in the derived class to be considered different, I have no idea why the MS runtime doesn't return it, while it returns Derived:GetHashCode() and object:GetHashCode(), maybe because the latter is virtual? What happens if you also define a set method in Derived:P1? + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-30 06:28 ------- +Created an attachment (id=18582) +New test case + _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
