Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=80935 --- shadow/80935 2007-02-27 12:41:23.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/80935.tmp.30733 2007-02-27 12:57:14.000000000 -0500 @@ -71,6 +71,22 @@ signature only, then it should detect no difference, the problem is only appeares on Vista in second run confirmation (uac) screen. On first screen publisher correctly displayed for both files. May be I should try signcode under windows with pvk+spc I use on linux... I'll try it and post results. + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 12:57 ------- +oh, so there's a second confirmation screen in Vista ? I don't have +Vista and I can't read russian ;-) + +Was the Windows-signed EXE signed with Vista ? +or an earlier Windows OS ? + +Could you attach a (very) small file (e.g. console hello world) signed +with Windows and Linux - and confirm that the same issue exists ? + +From that I'll try to see how the authenticode signature blob differs +between the two (and it will be easier/faster with smaller files than +cureit.exe). + +Thanks _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
