Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81039 --- shadow/81039 2007-03-06 12:36:00.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/81039.tmp.23465 2007-03-06 12:40:14.000000000 -0500 @@ -43,6 +43,14 @@ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-06 12:36 ------- We include Com support now, and possibly some Com interop code gets turned on in 2.0 or 1.1. + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-06 12:40 ------- +Our COM support should only occur if a series of COM specific +attributes are used. (MS actually performs COM specific features on +runtime wrappers for COM objects even if the attributes are not +present, but we are not there yet). Also, this is a pinvoke not a COM +call so COM features should definitely not be used (unless I +introduced a bug). _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
