Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81133 --- shadow/81133 2007-03-13 20:32:28.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/81133.tmp.8177 2007-03-13 21:39:16.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ Bug#: 81133 -Product: Mono: Class Libraries +Product: Mono: Runtime Version: 1.2 -OS: +OS: unknown OS Details: Debian Etch, kernel 2.6.12.6-xen, x86_64 Status: NEW Resolution: -Severity: -Priority: Major -Component: System.Security +Severity: Unknown +Priority: Wishlist +Component: misc AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TargetMilestone: --- URL: Cc: @@ -67,6 +67,31 @@ Additional Information: In fact I need security manager for real project not for this test. I am using in .NET PrincipalPermission attribute in this usage: [PrincipalPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, Role = "test")] as critical part of remote proxy security. + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-13 21:39 ------- +Downgrading priority. Please note that the security manager is +*experimental* (i.e. not supported) and provided only as a preview in +Mono 1.2. + +I don't have a x64 to test this myself (it works on my x86) but it +looks like monobuild x64 (sles9) doesn't have this issue using SVN HEAD +http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/builds/HEAD/sles-9-x86_64/mono/74212/logs/test-cas.log + +I'm not sure which version of mono you are using but: + +- there was a regression in the stack walking code just before the +last release (but I'm pretty sure it didn't break this test); + +- bug #80936 also limited the use of PrincipalPermission (again this +never affect this particular test case). + +Both issues will be fixed in the next Mono release but the security +manager is (and stays) experimental and unsupported - i.e. it +shouldn't be used for a "critical part" of anything. + +In this particular case, non-CAS permission, the use of imperative +security (source) instead of declarative security (attribute) should +work (in a non-experimental and supported way). _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
