Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81178 --- shadow/81178 2007-03-27 01:22:57.000000000 -0500 +++ shadow/81178.tmp.8489 2007-04-04 09:55:35.000000000 -0400 @@ -31,6 +31,23 @@ EMF metafile (it's not) but decodes/display it correctly. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-19 12:29 ------- Created an attachment (id=18929) RTF file that contains the image + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-04 09:55 ------- +There is no bug in the codec signature decoding :| + +The WMF without an Aldus placeable header shouldn't be detected by +GDI+ as it's header doesn't match the signature(s) of any codec. +However it is, somehow, detected as a EMF metafile (but it's a 16bits +WMF). Even more messed up is that the image can still be displayed +correctly (so the headers are obviously not used). + +This isn't the first time that the "correct" and "published" headers +information diverges. I may have to duplicate headers so we return MS +GDI+ compatible values while we use "valid" values to process metafiles. + +All this is probable due to the fact that GDI+ doesn't do itself a lot +wrt metafiles (and even less correct stuff) and only delegates that +stuff at GDI. However that doesn't explains codec signature mishandling :| _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
