Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=79434 --- shadow/79434 2007-04-18 10:22:57.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/79434.tmp.20044 2007-04-18 10:26:25.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ Bug#: 79434 Product: Mono: Compilers Version: 1.0 OS: unknown OS Details: -Status: REOPENED -Resolution: +Status: RESOLVED +Resolution: FIXED Severity: Unknown Priority: Minor Component: C# AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @@ -136,6 +136,35 @@ application built using csc 2.0. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-18 10:22 ------- Created an attachment (id=19079) test.zip - Updated test case + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-18 10:26 ------- +I attached a better test case. Previously I used reflection which I +stated was not a reliable way to determine order. I have attached a +test which actually uses COM Interop. Note that things seem to be +working correctly, i.e. both mono and. Net have the same output. + +$ ./test.exe +Meth1 +Meth2 +Meth3 +PropSet +PropGet + +$ mono test.exe +Meth1 +Meth2 +Meth3 +PropSet +PropGet + +Thus, this bug is fixed as far as I am concerned since I opened it in +regards to COM Interop. + +If there is problems with member order dealing with reflection, I +would open a new bug or ignore as reflection has no guarantee of +member order (and in fact MS changes it between releases). + + _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
