Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81191 --- shadow/81191 2007-04-19 17:31:36.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/81191.tmp.14861 2007-04-20 08:19:21.000000000 -0400 @@ -160,6 +160,28 @@ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-19 17:31 ------- On tab 2, as I also said, I don't know what should we do: follow the 1.1 behaviour, or the one of 2.0. Right now I'm following the behaviour fo 2.0. In tab 4, it's a small issue I didn't observe, so I think I can fix it. + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-20 08:19 ------- +Carlos, if possible we should follow the behavior that matches the +individual framework version, meaning the 1.1 behavior on the 1.0 +profile and the 2.0 behavior on the 2.0 profile. + +If you're fixing tab #2 for the 1.0 profile, then please make that +change 1.0 only. Same goes for tab #4: make that change only for the +2.0 profile. + +Tab #5 applies to both 1.0 and 2.0 profile. + +I've updated the repro again to cope with different behavior between +1.1 and 2.0 for tab #4. + +To compile it for 1.1: +mcs /r:System.Drawing.dll /r:System.Windows.Forms.dll /target:winexe +test.cs && mono test.exe + +To compile it for 2.0: +gmcs /r:System.Drawing.dll /r:System.Windows.Forms.dll /target:winexe + /d:NET_2_0 test.cs && mono test.exe _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
