Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81640 --- shadow/81640 2007-05-16 13:43:23.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/81640.tmp.7240 2007-05-16 16:14:50.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ Bug#: 81640 Product: Mono: Class Libraries Version: 1.2 OS: All OS Details: -Status: NEW -Resolution: -Severity: +Status: RESOLVED +Resolution: FIXED +Severity: Unknown Priority: Normal Component: CORLIB AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TargetMilestone: --- @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ Due to the fact that TypeBuilder.GetField(s) returns FieldBuilder instances we've already had to introduce a hack in FieldBuilder (see bug #81638) which causes a regression (see test TestSetValueComplete in FieldBuilderTest, which is now failing). Would it be ok to change this behaviour ? Does (g)mcs rely on this ? + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-16 16:14 ------- +Fixed in svn; part by Zoltan as part of revision 77505, and part by +me in revision 77508. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
