Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=82099 --- shadow/82099 2007-07-14 02:48:30.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/82099.tmp.27173 2007-07-17 00:27:23.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ Bug#: 82099 Product: Mono: Class Libraries Version: 1.2 OS: All OS Details: -Status: NEW -Resolution: -Severity: +Status: RESOLVED +Resolution: NOTABUG +Severity: Unknown Priority: Normal Component: Sys.XML AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TargetMilestone: --- @@ -31,6 +31,20 @@ No console output. Exit code is 1. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-14 02:48 ------- Created an attachment (id=19561) Repro + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-17 00:27 ------- +To my understanding it contradicts bug #77241 (or +XsdValidatingReaderTests.EmptyContentAllowWhitespace() as a test +case). When we take whitespaces considered in validation (I am rather +tempted to think this is *more* correct though), we/.net must fail for +the #77241 case. + +So, to my understanding, the validation is ambiguously implemented in +.NET. Based on the fact, I chose "harmless" direction i.e. do not +reject possibly valid documents, than allowing possibly invalid documents. + +Unless there is misunderstanding or other reasons to fix this issue, I +won't do anything. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
