Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81627 --- shadow/81627 2007-07-18 12:57:06.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/81627.tmp.27111 2007-07-18 13:23:00.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ Bug#: 81627 Product: Mono: Class Libraries Version: 1.2 OS: unknown OS Details: mono 1.2.3.1 -Status: ASSIGNED +Status: NEEDINFO Resolution: Severity: Unknown Priority: Normal Component: System AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @@ -186,6 +186,20 @@ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-18 06:15 ------- Created an attachment (id=19577) FSWTest.cs - test program/simple benchmark + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-18 13:23 ------- +Gabriel, I have tested using a similar script, but written in C# and +it didn't increase the memory consumption. The problem might be +associated with the FileSystemWatcher implementation that you're +using. In my test mono used inotify to monitor files. + +What OS did you perform the tests? In case of linux, could you test me +which notification mecanism was used? + +Did you have the MONO_MANAGED_WATCHER enviroment variable set? + +Juraj, your patch looks fine, could you sent it to the mono-devel list +so it can have more reviews as it touches some very sensible code. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
