Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81956 --- shadow/81956 2007-08-13 14:26:25.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/81956.tmp.13999 2007-08-13 14:26:44.000000000 -0400 @@ -493,6 +493,31 @@ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-13 14:26 ------- Created an attachment (id=19793) Zip file containing all the necessary files to reproduce + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-13 14:26 ------- +Ok, I've attached a full and complete testcase in a zip file above. + +testcase.cs: this is the actual testcase +test[1-6].cs: these are the bare minimum files required to compile the +Mono.BigInteger stuff + + +Procedure: +compile using gmcs and run under ms.net (you need the /unsafe switch(, +it dies. + +Compile using csc and run under ms.net, it doesn't die. + + +Expected result: +It should run perfectly no matter what compiler is used. + +As for thread safety, both tests i pasted should be equally +threadsafe. Before performing any calcuations i create new instances +of the big integers involved. The second testcase uses instance +methods which are 100% used thread-safely. + + _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
